Discussion:
American Apparel bankruptcy: Were risqué ads a turnoff for consumers?
(too old to reply)
Roger
2015-10-05 22:45:32 UTC
Permalink
American Apparel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Monday after
listing $199.3 million in assets and $397.6 million in debt,
giving the company a negative book value.

The retailer known for its made-in-the-USA clothing has about
8,500 employees and 230 stores throughout the world. It is not
yet clear whether the company plans to lay off any employees or
close any stores.

The deal struck with creditors through a debt-for-equity
conversion would allow the company to maintain current
operations and bondholders to gain shares in the company in
place of their current debt.

The company’s shares closed at 11.2 cents Friday after
announcing in August it might not have enough capital to sustain
operations as normal for 12 months. The Los Angeles-based
company has not made a profit since 2009.

Founder and former CEO Dov Charney was fired in Dec. 2014,
facing a number of lawsuits accusing him of sexual harassment.
Mr. Charney has since sued the company, saying that the
accusations are unfounded.

And along with internal drama, American Apparel has faced
growing competition from fast-fashion retailers such as H&M,
Forever 21, and Zara who can offer young consumers cheap
clothing manufactured overseas. Gap has also suffered from fast-
fashion competition, announcing in June that the chain will be
closing 175 stores, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

But American Apparel’s new CEO Paula Schneider has denied rumors
that the company would move production outside of the US to cut
down on costs. “We will continue to manufacture in America,” she
said. “That’s what the brand is. That’s what it’s about.”

The company has also been dogged for years by concerns over what
many consider to be overly sexualized advertising.

In an advertising study published in the American Psychological
Association journal in July, a group of psychologists disagree
with the assumption that sex sells. “In general, we found
violent and sexual programs, and ads with violent or sexual
content decreased advertising effectiveness,” they wrote. “Sex
and violence do not sell, in fact they may even backfire by
impairing memory, attitudes and buying intentions for advertised
products.”

Clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch has experienced some of
the same ills. Once a coveted brand of the 1990s and early
2000s, the stock is down 30 percent this year and is trading at
its lowest levels since early 2009. Before retiring in January,
CEO Mike Jeffries faced criticism after making comments about
only wanting “cool, good-looking people” to wear his company’s
clothes.

Reports last year from Nielson and other consulting groups
confirm that millennials are “more likely to consider
sustainability and social responsibility in their buying
decisions than previous generations,” the Guardian reported. In
other words, even if retailers like American Apparel and A&F
compete on pricing and style, “that doesn’t mean I want to shop
at a place that treats other people badly,” one millennial
confirmed.

And for American Apparel, allegations against Charney likely
amplified a shaky advertising plan. “When the allegations that
he was sexually inappropriate arose it turned something that was
fun and exciting into something creepy,” Nicky Baird, an analyst
at Retail Systems Research, told the Guardian.

Viewers in the UK have been creeped out for awhile now.
Britain's Advertising Standards Authority has been banning
certain American Apparel adds since 2009, arguing that the
retailer's ads "inappropriately sexualized young women."

American Apparel and A&F have both confirmed they will end
overly sexy ads in an effort to improve sales.

“By improving our financial footing, we will be able to refocus
our business efforts … and create captivating new marketing
campaigns that will help drive our business forward,” Ms.
Schneider said in a statement Monday.

And while there is no confirmation about what these ‘new
marketing campaigns’ will be, they will likely be a reserved
take on the company’s risqué past branding.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/1005/American-Apparel-
bankruptcy-Were-risque-ads-a-turnoff-for-consumers
tesla sTinker
2016-11-19 21:02:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger
American Apparel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Monday after
listing $199.3 million in assets and $397.6 million in debt,
giving the company a negative book value.
The retailer known for its made-in-the-USA clothing has about
8,500 employees and 230 stores throughout the world. It is not
yet clear whether the company plans to lay off any employees or
close any stores.
The deal struck with creditors through a debt-for-equity
conversion would allow the company to maintain current
operations and bondholders to gain shares in the company in
place of their current debt.
The company’s shares closed at 11.2 cents Friday after
announcing in August it might not have enough capital to sustain
operations as normal for 12 months. The Los Angeles-based
company has not made a profit since 2009.
Founder and former CEO Dov Charney was fired in Dec. 2014,
facing a number of lawsuits accusing him of sexual harassment.
Mr. Charney has since sued the company, saying that the
accusations are unfounded.
And along with internal drama, American Apparel has faced
growing competition from fast-fashion retailers such as H&M,
Forever 21, and Zara who can offer young consumers cheap
clothing manufactured overseas. Gap has also suffered from fast-
fashion competition, announcing in June that the chain will be
closing 175 stores, The Christian Science Monitor reported.
But American Apparel’s new CEO Paula Schneider has denied rumors
that the company would move production outside of the US to cut
down on costs. “We will continue to manufacture in America,” she
said. “That’s what the brand is. That’s what it’s about.”
The company has also been dogged for years by concerns over what
many consider to be overly sexualized advertising.
In an advertising study published in the American Psychological
Association journal in July, a group of psychologists disagree
with the assumption that sex sells. “In general, we found
violent and sexual programs, and ads with violent or sexual
content decreased advertising effectiveness,” they wrote. “Sex
and violence do not sell, in fact they may even backfire by
impairing memory, attitudes and buying intentions for advertised
products.”
Clothing retailer Abercrombie& Fitch has experienced some of
the same ills. Once a coveted brand of the 1990s and early
2000s, the stock is down 30 percent this year and is trading at
its lowest levels since early 2009. Before retiring in January,
CEO Mike Jeffries faced criticism after making comments about
only wanting “cool, good-looking people” to wear his company’s
clothes.
Reports last year from Nielson and other consulting groups
confirm that millennials are “more likely to consider
sustainability and social responsibility in their buying
decisions than previous generations,” the Guardian reported. In
other words, even if retailers like American Apparel and A&F
compete on pricing and style, “that doesn’t mean I want to shop
at a place that treats other people badly,” one millennial
confirmed.
And for American Apparel, allegations against Charney likely
amplified a shaky advertising plan. “When the allegations that
he was sexually inappropriate arose it turned something that was
fun and exciting into something creepy,” Nicky Baird, an analyst
at Retail Systems Research, told the Guardian.
Viewers in the UK have been creeped out for awhile now.
Britain's Advertising Standards Authority has been banning
certain American Apparel adds since 2009, arguing that the
retailer's ads "inappropriately sexualized young women."
American Apparel and A&F have both confirmed they will end
overly sexy ads in an effort to improve sales.
“By improving our financial footing, we will be able to refocus
our business efforts … and create captivating new marketing
campaigns that will help drive our business forward,” Ms.
Schneider said in a statement Monday.
And while there is no confirmation about what these ‘new
marketing campaigns’ will be, they will likely be a reserved
take on the company’s risqué past branding.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/1005/American-Apparel-
bankruptcy-Were-risque-ads-a-turnoff-for-consumers
Most of what they have done in marketing does not work.
the computer is why.

I mean, just look at the banks. They have every type of tom dick and
harry debit rip card with fees all over them. Then they want to claim
they are global. And that they have to know who you are for you to spend
your money.. Horse shit to you VISA. Shuv it, My Gun is loaded. And
if you stomp your pompass thieving ass in and around here, we will just
blow your head off any banker debit fuck me shit. We hate you banks,
because, you are full of your stealing mortal sins... And then, the
police department says, oh, thats ok for them to do that.!!!! As if
Uncle Sam is
not going to feel the presence of another deity bankruptsy.

Shuv it Darius.
AND that certainly goes for you Trump as well. All thats all thats left
now, is
every man for himself.

How many more sinful thieves will run down to the so called Uncle Sam to
fill their pockets up, letting the tax payer
bail em out footing the bill. THAT is exactly why, I dont pay taxes.
Get on the end of the barrel of my gun fuck you fed, your next in line
for your boom sake.
tesla sTinker
2016-11-19 21:17:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger
American Apparel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Monday after
listing $199.3 million in assets and $397.6 million in debt,
giving the company a negative book value.
The retailer known for its made-in-the-USA clothing has about
8,500 employees and 230 stores throughout the world. It is not
yet clear whether the company plans to lay off any employees or
close any stores.
The deal struck with creditors through a debt-for-equity
conversion would allow the company to maintain current
operations and bondholders to gain shares in the company in
place of their current debt.
The company’s shares closed at 11.2 cents Friday after
announcing in August it might not have enough capital to sustain
operations as normal for 12 months. The Los Angeles-based
company has not made a profit since 2009.
Founder and former CEO Dov Charney was fired in Dec. 2014,
facing a number of lawsuits accusing him of sexual harassment.
Mr. Charney has since sued the company, saying that the
accusations are unfounded.
And along with internal drama, American Apparel has faced
growing competition from fast-fashion retailers such as H&M,
Forever 21, and Zara who can offer young consumers cheap
clothing manufactured overseas. Gap has also suffered from fast-
fashion competition, announcing in June that the chain will be
closing 175 stores, The Christian Science Monitor reported.
But American Apparel’s new CEO Paula Schneider has denied rumors
that the company would move production outside of the US to cut
down on costs. “We will continue to manufacture in America,” she
said. “That’s what the brand is. That’s what it’s about.”
The company has also been dogged for years by concerns over what
many consider to be overly sexualized advertising.
In an advertising study published in the American Psychological
Association journal in July, a group of psychologists disagree
with the assumption that sex sells. “In general, we found
violent and sexual programs, and ads with violent or sexual
content decreased advertising effectiveness,” they wrote. “Sex
and violence do not sell, in fact they may even backfire by
impairing memory, attitudes and buying intentions for advertised
products.”
Clothing retailer Abercrombie& Fitch has experienced some of
the same ills. Once a coveted brand of the 1990s and early
2000s, the stock is down 30 percent this year and is trading at
its lowest levels since early 2009. Before retiring in January,
CEO Mike Jeffries faced criticism after making comments about
only wanting “cool, good-looking people” to wear his company’s
clothes.
Reports last year from Nielson and other consulting groups
confirm that millennials are “more likely to consider
sustainability and social responsibility in their buying
decisions than previous generations,” the Guardian reported. In
other words, even if retailers like American Apparel and A&F
compete on pricing and style, “that doesn’t mean I want to shop
at a place that treats other people badly,” one millennial
confirmed.
And for American Apparel, allegations against Charney likely
amplified a shaky advertising plan. “When the allegations that
he was sexually inappropriate arose it turned something that was
fun and exciting into something creepy,” Nicky Baird, an analyst
at Retail Systems Research, told the Guardian.
Viewers in the UK have been creeped out for awhile now.
Britain's Advertising Standards Authority has been banning
certain American Apparel adds since 2009, arguing that the
retailer's ads "inappropriately sexualized young women."
American Apparel and A&F have both confirmed they will end
overly sexy ads in an effort to improve sales.
“By improving our financial footing, we will be able to refocus
our business efforts … and create captivating new marketing
campaigns that will help drive our business forward,” Ms.
Schneider said in a statement Monday.
And while there is no confirmation about what these ‘new
marketing campaigns’ will be, they will likely be a reserved
take on the company’s risqué past branding.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/1005/American-Apparel-
bankruptcy-Were-risque-ads-a-turnoff-for-consumers
pathetic

They should of killed the entire Federal Government long ago.
They will not screw me any longer. The true Catholic Church
said odious long ago... 666 Trump, just does not understand that.
Since it is his kind, as these ones above, that keep to steal
from the system that steals. As if they can continue to screw the
real catholic.

Loading...